result := sum_of_squares(3, 4);
Communicative activity of other kinds will generally be much less likely to falsely injure reputation. Thus, it may be unwise to expose all such activity to the specter of litigation. But that is not because the law limits its principled moral concern for the negligent infliction of reputational injury to statements of and concerning injured plaintiffs. After all, in cases involving noncommunicative activity that negligently injures reputation, the law is much less wary of affording redress, which it generally affords under the auspices of the negligence tort rather than defamation.251 So, for example, courts have allowed physicians to recover in negligence for reputational injury foreseeably inflicted by the negligent servicing or design of medical products.252
，推荐阅读谷歌浏览器获取更多信息
Фото: Максим Богодвид / РИА Новости
[&:first-child]:overflow-hidden [&:first-child]:max-h-full"